2008 RNC Journalist Arrests

It’s hard not to sound political when you’re talking about protesters at a political event and linking to admittedly partisan sources. Yet, the story of the protests at the 2008 Republican National Convention was perhaps successfully buried by the arrests of what some have called “dozens of journalists, photographers, bloggers and videomakers. I’ve watched Twin Cities IndyMedia LiveWire and it seemed like every time I looked, there was another (unsubstantiated) report of journalists being arrested or gassed. We afford journalists legal protection because of the important role they play in keeping government transparent and accountable to the public. Every journalism school I’ve been at has said it’s tough work, and this shows it.

A good friend once said that he couldn’t see how nonviolent protest could fail to cure a social ill. I’ve always been a little skeptical of this view, largely because of its reliance on media to show what happens to protesters. But it’s surprising how YouTube and Twitter might hold some hope for this view–even though they’re only getting the message out to people who are interested.

Here’s a playlist of a few journalist arrest videos.

Mashing up censorship in the U.S. and China

Recent events in my home, the Twin Cities, have shocked me.

The following is entirely quoted from two sources.  One is an account of being arrested and sent to prison in China for planning a peaceful protest at the 2008 Summer Olympics, and the other is an account of being intimidated for planning a peaceful protest at the 2008 Republican National Convention.  Again, everything is quoted, but since this is kind of a “mash up,” I ask you to follow the above links to read the entire stories for yourself.
Continue reading “Mashing up censorship in the U.S. and China”

Correction, of sorts

PGP creator Philip Zimmermann posted the (lack of an) issue he had with Sen. Biden and the encryption bill.

Declan quotes me, creating the impression I criticized Biden for some legislation that Biden introduced in 1991. Declan’s quote from me is out of context because it does not make it clear that I never mentioned Biden in my original quote at all when I wrote about Senate Bill 266.

I still find it interesting that the law in part inspired him to write some code, but owe it to my one reader to set the record straight.

Constructing Biden’s Laws

Declan McCullagh gives a detailed overview of Joe Biden’s positions on a variety of tech laws. He brings out much of what I expected–there may be cause for some worry on a variety of fronts like copyright, privacy, and the “war on terror.” Whether you agree or disagree with his politics, there were a number of interesting responses to some of the laws that he proposed and voted for. I’d call these responses constructions of the law–or actions carried out in response to the law that essentially help “create” it in society.

On privacy, Biden’s record is hardly stellar. In the 1990s, Biden was
chairman of the Judiciary Committee and introduced a bill called the Comprehensive Counter-Terrorism Act
Biden’s bill — and the threat of encryption being outlawed — is what
spurred Phil Zimmermann to write PGP, thereby kicking off a historic
debate about export controls, national security, and privacy.
Zimmermann, who’s now busy developing Zfone, says it was Biden’s legislation
“that led me to publish PGP electronically for free that year, shortly
before the measure was defeated after vigorous protest by civil
libertarians and industry groups.”

Pretty Good Privacy” (PGP) is a technology that encrypts or locks things and bases the unlocking on trust (the Wikipedia article is a surprisingly engaging read about the technology and history). The point here is that the restrictions created by the legislation played a part in driving PGP’s creator, Phil Zimmerman, to write this extraordinary piece of software.

One day after a bomb in Saudi Arabia killed several U.S. servicemen and virtually flattened a military base, Biden pushed to make posting bomb-making information on the Internet a felony, punishable by up to 20 years in jail, the Wall Street Journal reported at the time. …

Biden’s proposal became law in 1997. It didn’t amount to much: four years after its enactment, there had been only one conviction. …Today there are over 10,000 hits on Google for the phrase, in quotes, “Drano bomb.” … Then there’s the U.S. Army’s Improvised Munitions Handbook with instructions on making far more deadly compounds, including methyl nitrate dynamite, mortars, grenades, and C-4 plastic explosive — which free speech activists placed online as an in-your-face response to the Biden-Feinstein bill.

A long quote, but it says a bit about the laws effectiveness and how people have responded to it.