Alternative Internet Voices Shuttered

Two important alternative voices on the Internet, Wikileaks and P2P.net, have both announced that they need to temporarily shut their doors.  With server costs in the tens to hundreds of thousands of dollars, one can assume that advertising and donations didn’t quite bring in enough to keep things running.

This is an important reminder that speech online is not free–especially if you have something interesting or important to say. I’d argue that, these are perfect arguments for Internet Neutrality. If providers were allowed to shift to a scheme where they can charge sites like this extra for access, one can only imagine how many other ideas might be chilled.

Who knew that, in an age of thinking about how we might fund newspapers, we might also need to think about how alternative voices are funded online as well.

New York Times Ready to Charge Online Readers

It appears as though the Times might be getting ready to start charging online readers.

The Times has considered three types of pay strategies. One option was a more traditional pay wall along the lines of The Wall Street Journal, in which some parts of the site are free and some subscription-only. … Another option was the metered system. The third choice, an NPR-style membership model, was abandoned last fall, two sources explained.

As a long-time subscriber, and recent iPhone reader, I say it’s about time! I’m glad to see that they’ve considered more than just two options (pay/no pay), yet I’m surprised they didn’t see yet another–pay for more than the first paragraph. Many online readers are looking for a quick fix of news on the go, and writing in the inverted pyramid should already accommodate for this. I’ve said before that sites like Newser could point the way, but the execs haven’t quite grasped that the technology might allow them to intricately tailor what their readers see/pay for. As former deputy managing editor Jon Landman said:

The idea of two camps is just wrong. There’s many shades to this.

via New York Times Ready to Charge Online Readers — Daily Intel (New York Magazine),
via Slashdot News Story | NY Times To Charge For Online Content

Less science, more drama

Making science into a matter of opinion or controversy is perhaps a new trend in Journalism. Ars Technica poses the question of whether this is good journalistic practice. They explain one telling situation:

[Autism is] a complicated message, which really requires a credible and authoritative source to convey. ABC News responded to that requirement by turning to actress Jenny McCarthy, who (predictably) complained that doctors weren’t “listening to our anecdotal evidence.” McCarthy has a long history of dismissing epidemiology, statistics, and all the other evidence-based tools we use to make public health decisions, so ABC News knew exactly what it was doing by giving her a podium.

This really gets to the heart of a question in journalistic practice–the balance between presenting “truth” and efforts to “present all sides equally.” Unfortunately, the two do not always coincide. I think I agree with Ars’ assessment:

In essence, the message it sent was “we will intentionally undercut the best available science using a celebrity.” Calling that message irresponsible grossly understates the problem.

via Why is the news media comfortable with lying about science?.

An account of being served with a subpoena

Here’s a wonderful, detailed account of a journalist being served with a subpoena for their reporting information.  Included is a great plug for formal Journalism education:

When someone in uniform orders you to do something, most travelers’ first instinct is to comply immediately. As a tax-paying, law-abiding citizen, that was certainly my reflexive response when a federal agent visited my home.Thank God for that journalism law class I was required to take as a graduate student at Berkeley. Had I missed it, I might have rolled over and let the government have its way. But then I heard myself say, “I need to talk to my lawyer” and the agent’s response: “I had a feeling you’d say that.” He was still smiling.

via Insider tips for dealing with the TSA – Christopher Elliott- msnbc.com.