<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>John Thomson: Thinking out loud &#187; Worth a Look</title>
	<atom:link href="http://johnthomson.org/blog/category/worth-a-look/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://johnthomson.org</link>
	<description>Thoughts on the social impacts of information and communication technology policy.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 13:41:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Social networking too proprietary</title>
		<link>http://johnthomson.org/blog/2010/07/29/social-networking-too-proprietary</link>
		<comments>http://johnthomson.org/blog/2010/07/29/social-networking-too-proprietary#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 13:41:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>john</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media / Sociology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Worth a Look]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnthomson.org/?p=849</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I can&#8217;t begin to say how much I agree with this.  Standards and open platforms for online social networking would be huge. The network effect would likely slow a migration down, but I&#8217;m glad someone is working on it. Could open source tools make Facebook the next AOL? &#8211; Computerworld. (0)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t begin to say how much I agree with this.  Standards and open platforms for online social networking would be <em>huge</em>. The network effect would likely slow a migration down, but I&#8217;m glad someone is working on it.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9179785/Could_open_source_tools_make_Facebook_the_next_AOL_">Could open source tools make Facebook the next AOL? &#8211; Computerworld</a>.</p>
<a href="http://johnthomson.org/blog/2010/07/29/social-networking-too-proprietary" rel="bookmark" class="asides-permalink" title="Permanent Link to Social networking too proprietary">(0)</a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://johnthomson.org/blog/2010/07/29/social-networking-too-proprietary/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Online-driven evolution of social mores</title>
		<link>http://johnthomson.org/blog/2010/07/20/online-driven-evolution-of-social-mores</link>
		<comments>http://johnthomson.org/blog/2010/07/20/online-driven-evolution-of-social-mores#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 23:45:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>john</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media / Sociology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Worth a Look]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnthomson.org/?p=841</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On Facebook, Google, and Our Evolving Social Mores Online &#8211; John Battelle&#8217;s Searchblog. This is along the same lines of my previous post about the Tweeting CNN editor, but zooms out for a much broader view of the impact of online social networks on our moral frameworks. I have to dig deeper on this one, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://battellemedia.com/archives/2010/07/on_facebook_google_and_our_evolving_social_mores_online.php?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+JohnBattellesSearchblog+%28John+Battelle%27s+Searchblog%29">On Facebook, Google, and Our Evolving Social Mores Online &#8211; John Battelle&#8217;s Searchblog</a>.</p>
<p>This is along the same lines of my previous post about the Tweeting CNN editor, but zooms out for a much broader view of the impact of online social networks on our moral frameworks. I have to dig deeper on this one, so I can&#8217;t comment here, but hopefully someone finds it interesting.</p>
<a href="http://johnthomson.org/blog/2010/07/20/online-driven-evolution-of-social-mores" rel="bookmark" class="asides-permalink" title="Permanent Link to Online-driven evolution of social mores">(0)</a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://johnthomson.org/blog/2010/07/20/online-driven-evolution-of-social-mores/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Catch up</title>
		<link>http://johnthomson.org/blog/2010/07/20/catch-up-3</link>
		<comments>http://johnthomson.org/blog/2010/07/20/catch-up-3#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 23:37:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>john</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Worth a Look]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnthomson.org/?p=836</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have a backlog of articles that are a little stale, but resonated to such a degree that i can&#8217;t resist commenting a bit on them.  Hopefully they are new news to someone. (0)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a backlog of articles that are a little stale, but resonated to such a degree that i can&#8217;t resist commenting a bit on them.  Hopefully they are new news to someone.</p>
<a href="http://johnthomson.org/blog/2010/07/20/catch-up-3" rel="bookmark" class="asides-permalink" title="Permanent Link to Catch up">(0)</a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://johnthomson.org/blog/2010/07/20/catch-up-3/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Taxes, privacy at center of Amazon tiff with North Carolina</title>
		<link>http://johnthomson.org/blog/2010/04/21/taxes-privacy-at-center-of-amazon-tiff-with-north-carolina</link>
		<comments>http://johnthomson.org/blog/2010/04/21/taxes-privacy-at-center-of-amazon-tiff-with-north-carolina#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2010 16:45:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>john</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Mass Communication Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Worth a Look]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnthomson.org/?p=786</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Taxes, privacy at center of Amazon tiff with North Carolina. Way to go Amazon! (0)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2010/04/taxes-privacy-at-center-of-amazon-tiff-with-north-carolina.ars?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss">Taxes, privacy at center of Amazon tiff with North Carolina</a>.</p>
<p>Way to go Amazon!</p>
<a href="http://johnthomson.org/blog/2010/04/21/taxes-privacy-at-center-of-amazon-tiff-with-north-carolina" rel="bookmark" class="asides-permalink" title="Permanent Link to Taxes, privacy at center of Amazon tiff with North Carolina">(0)</a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://johnthomson.org/blog/2010/04/21/taxes-privacy-at-center-of-amazon-tiff-with-north-carolina/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Economist: copyright terms should be shorter</title>
		<link>http://johnthomson.org/blog/2010/04/13/economist-copyright-terms-should-be-shorter</link>
		<comments>http://johnthomson.org/blog/2010/04/13/economist-copyright-terms-should-be-shorter#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2010 23:03:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>john</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Worth a Look]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnthomson.org/?p=763</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From The Economist! The question is how such a deal can be made equitably. At the moment, the terms of trade favour publishers too much. A return to the 28-year copyrights of the Statute of Anne would be in many ways arbitrary, but not unreasonable. If there is a case for longer terms, they should [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From <em>The Economist</em>!</p>
<blockquote><p>The question is how such a deal can be made equitably. At the moment, the terms of trade favour publishers too much. A return to the 28-year copyrights of the Statute of Anne would be in many ways arbitrary, but not unreasonable. If there is a case for longer terms, they should be on a renewal basis, so that content is not locked up automatically. The value society places on creativity means that fair use needs to be expanded and inadvertent infringement should be minimally penalised. None of this should get in the way of the enforcement of copyright, which remains a vital tool in the encouragement of learning. But tools are not ends in themselves.</p></blockquote>
<p>via <a href="http://www.economist.com/opinion/displaystory.cfm?story_id=15868004">Protecting creativity: Copyright and wrong | The Economist</a>.</p>
<a href="http://johnthomson.org/blog/2010/04/13/economist-copyright-terms-should-be-shorter" rel="bookmark" class="asides-permalink" title="Permanent Link to Economist: copyright terms should be shorter">(0)</a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://johnthomson.org/blog/2010/04/13/economist-copyright-terms-should-be-shorter/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
