<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Apple&#8217;s Neutrality Runaround</title>
	<atom:link href="http://johnthomson.org/blog/2006/05/03/apples-neutrality-runaround/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://johnthomson.org/blog/2006/05/03/apples-neutrality-runaround</link>
	<description>Thoughts on the social impacts of information and communication technology policy.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2011 01:48:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Thomson &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Slashback</title>
		<link>http://johnthomson.org/blog/2006/05/03/apples-neutrality-runaround/comment-page-1#comment-182</link>
		<dc:creator>John Thomson &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Slashback</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Jul 2006 18:08:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnthomson.org/blog/archives/91#comment-182</guid>
		<description>[...] Microsoft is feeling the heat from its shareholders to make a statement on net neutrality. This is surprising to me, since they&#8217;ve been much more vocal than Apple in favor of neutrality. Perhaps more specifics from stakeholders such as Microsoft could help sway the debate; or perhaps there is an effort to avoid treading too close to anti-trust waters. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Microsoft is feeling the heat from its shareholders to make a statement on net neutrality. This is surprising to me, since they&#8217;ve been much more vocal than Apple in favor of neutrality. Perhaps more specifics from stakeholders such as Microsoft could help sway the debate; or perhaps there is an effort to avoid treading too close to anti-trust waters. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

