Comments on: The Net Neutrality Plot Thickens http://johnthomson.org/blog/2006/03/26/the-net-neutrality-plot-thickens Thoughts on the social impacts of information and communication technology policy. Thu, 08 Jul 2010 22:35:26 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0 By: john http://johnthomson.org/blog/2006/03/26/the-net-neutrality-plot-thickens/comment-page-1#comment-16 john Thu, 06 Apr 2006 00:18:13 +0000 http://johnthomson.org/blog/archives/71#comment-16 <blockquote>They should be free to build their own network for private use (so that it would be much like getting two separate signals for cable and Internet), but there’s no reason why this desire has to get mixed up with the Internet. When seen this way, there really would be no “free rider” problem because only their own content would be allowed through this separate network. When customers start complaining that the regular Internet speeds are too slow–then maybe things will open up.</blockquote> I've been thinking about this more and more lately and am still not sure which way it should go. On the one hand, anyone should be able to build their own private network and charge as they see fit (much like my private home network). But the point is that this separate network is not <em>the</em> Internet. Perhaps, again like my network, there is communication between it and the Internet, but without end-to-end it cannot be considered the internet. On the other hand, this interconnection could have the effect of diluting this principle, and even one day come to be considered to be <em>the</em> Internet (as though the Net were a brand). I am beginning to think that this possibility may outweigh my claim in the above post, unless there were great efforts to keep the networks separate (which would not be likely).

They should be free to build their own network for private use (so that it would be much like getting two separate signals for cable and Internet), but there’s no reason why this desire has to get mixed up with the Internet. When seen this way, there really would be no “free rider” problem because only their own content would be allowed through this separate network. When customers start complaining that the regular Internet speeds are too slow–then maybe things will open up.

I’ve been thinking about this more and more lately and am still not sure which way it should go.

On the one hand, anyone should be able to build their own private network and charge as they see fit (much like my private home network). But the point is that this separate network is not the Internet. Perhaps, again like my network, there is communication between it and the Internet, but without end-to-end it cannot be considered the internet.

On the other hand, this interconnection could have the effect of diluting this principle, and even one day come to be considered to be the Internet (as though the Net were a brand). I am beginning to think that this possibility may outweigh my claim in the above post, unless there were great efforts to keep the networks separate (which would not be likely).

]]> By: pkp646 http://johnthomson.org/blog/2006/03/26/the-net-neutrality-plot-thickens/comment-page-1#comment-12 pkp646 Mon, 03 Apr 2006 19:23:24 +0000 http://johnthomson.org/blog/archives/71#comment-12 You are right, they should be allowed to create their own networks and charge more for access. That's what the whole net neutrality debate is about, the freedom of property owners to use their property as they should like. I say let them do it for their own good and the good of the future of the internet. You are right, they should be allowed to create their own networks and charge more for access. That’s what the whole net neutrality debate is about, the freedom of property owners to use their property as they should like. I say let them do it for their own good and the good of the future of the internet.

]]>