Gaming civics – (almost) a Madison connection

I was preparing to teach next week’s “Quizzing and Gradebook” workshops on our course managment system, Learn@UW. Being a law geek, I thought a short quiz on civics would be an easy way to show off all of the quiz question types–until I saw this:

“Only one-third of Americans can name the three branches of government,” [Justice Sandra Day] O’Connor said, “but two-thirds can name a judge on American Idol.”

Hopefully my quiz won’t be too difficult for the participants, but the surprise in this story is the Madison connection.  Justice O’Connor is heading a project to develop a game called “Our Courts” to help seventh and eight graders learn about our judicial system, and she tapped Madison’s own James Gee (formerly of UW-Madison) to do it.

The game “lets students engage in real issues and real problems,” O’Connor said. It will allow them to “step into the shoes of a judge, a legislator, an executive — teach them how to think through and analyze problems, take action and voice opinions to their elected representatives.”

An early exercise in the game will likely deal with educating students about their First Amendment rights, using examples like Tinker v. Des Moines and the “Bong Hits For Jesus” case.

I love it! Having students step into existing problems is the best way to learn how the courts work–it’s exactly what we do in Intro to Mass Communication Law courses. Maybe the students who have played this game will do better on our hypothetical questions 🙂

Edupunk!

“Edupunk” sounds kind of like the kind of term an instructor might come up with to make their job feel that-much-cooler, but recent stories show the “concept of Edupunk has totally caught wind, spreading through the blogosphere like wildfire.”

If I am reading the (very little) information correctly, there’s an unresolved problem (beyond capitalist co-optation) pushing this movement: commercial educational technology software simply cannot hope to keep up with the pace of innovation.  Commercial educational software lately seems like a poor ripoff of successful online technologies.

The rip-mix punk spirit, to me, is embodied by the instructor who will seek the combination tools that will best meet the needs of their students.  Perhaps taking a rif from a commercial Google product with a strong open source Moodle backbeat will help students meet the objectives of a given course.  This scenario doesn’t necessarily have to be against the mainstream…

The most important thing would be to foster this educational and technological creativity.

Edit: I never said whether I saw myself as “edupunk.” I’m drawn to tinkering, which may bring me to some punk tools, but as a geek and a violinist, it’s hard to call myself “punk” anything.

.gov web sites should focus on RSS

Ars points to a paper that argues “Rather than struggling, as it currently does, to design sites that meet each end-user need, we argue that the executive branch should focus on creating a simple, reliable and publicly accessible infrastructure that exposes the underlying data.”

I’m not as sure I agree with the part about pushing websites off to private entities (this sounds sort of like the function of the press), but timely feeds from the government should be a priority. The passage of laws and other rules can be very time-sensitive, and for the press/bloggers/academics/public to know just what the government is doing, adding a few feeds of interest would be an ideal way to stay in the loop.

This could become a hyper-transparent government (if the public is constantly giving feedback), but keeping an eye on things might be worth the cost of slowing some things down.

Old news

A few stories of interest after a weekend away: