Internet TV for couch potatos

One of my favorite blogs that doesn’t often make it to posts here is OSNews. Their editor, Eugenia, takes on an issue that I’ve been giving a lot of thought to lately–Internet TV (The Next Big Tech Battleground: the TV).

She starts out by stating, “I’m a couch potato.” Aren’t we all?

Eugenia’s experience with her PS3 with Netflix and Hulu Plus leads her to believe that the best way forward is to bake this kind of functionality into televisions.

I get all these movies, shows, documentaries that make me want to ditch my Comcast box (which costs me a whopping $90 per month for the HD channels and DVR — and that’s without the movie channels or HBO). The only thing that’s missing from the new experience is Live TV (e.g. sports). But if a “smart” platform reaches our TVs, that lets you run applications, and have access to Netflix/Hulu/etc. content via their native applications for that platform, then Live TV will be inevitable.

I’m not sure whether I agree or disagree with that specific point, but I think her target of “the couch potato” is very illustrative.

Most online media platforms (Google, Boxee, and to a lesser degree Hulu and Netflix) are structured more towards searching for online videos as opposed to just delivering them. To a couch potato, that sounds like work.

Digital Video Recorders are similar technology that has taken off smashingly well. It is easy to use a DVR.  They fit the way television programming is structured — it’s simple to record an episode or series, and every series is packaged together in easily navigable folders.  Internet TV doesn’t even come close.

Eugenia ends on a very insightful note:

The only real obstacle in the kind of future I present in this article are Comcast, AT&T, and Verizon. These companies make big business over their cable TV solutions, and it’s unfortunate that they’re also internet providers. Do you really think that Comcast will let you stream this highly competitive content over their network? I didn’t think so. It’d be like committing business suicide. …

So it all comes down to net neutrality. If this much-discussed law passes, at last, eventually our TVs will get revolutionized. Maybe it will take a few more years for all the TV manufacturers to settle down to the same platform, but it will happen.

I agree!

Could meaningful use be applied to FERPA?

One of the ongoing struggles of the educational technologist is dealing with FERPA law and instructor/student expectations.  Frequently an instructor will want to use a tool (hosted on campus or elsewhere) and want students to have access to the tool via automatic rostering.  Registrars can sometimes be hesitant to share this data.

The health sector is actually working on this problem. In an interesting post about the concept of “meaningful use” the author shows how restrictions on data might be loosened a bit to the benefit of everyone involved(Analysis: A defining moment for “meaningful use” – O’Reilly Radar). One example:

Another important relaxation is in the area of e-prescribing. This is the ability to electronically send an accurate and understandable prescription directly to a pharmacy.

By focusing on exactly how information might be used by stakeholders, rather than enforcing blanket restrictions, there may be some real gains in the quality of patient care. I think a similar concept for FERPA might have similar benefit.

Online-driven evolution of social mores

On Facebook, Google, and Our Evolving Social Mores Online – John Battelle’s Searchblog.

This is along the same lines of my previous post about the Tweeting CNN editor, but zooms out for a much broader view of the impact of online social networks on our moral frameworks. I have to dig deeper on this one, so I can’t comment here, but hopefully someone finds it interesting.